DOJ Seeks October Retrial for Tornado Cash’s Roman Storm as U.S. Privacy Policy Shifts
U.S. federal prosecutors have asked a Manhattan judge to schedule an October 2026 retrial for Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm on two criminal counts a jury failed to resolve last year. The move arrives at an awkward moment for the Department of Justice, as the same administration signals a markedly different posture toward crypto privacy tools than the one that originally brought these charges.
A Hung Jury, a New Trial Date
Manhattan U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton submitted a letter to Judge Katherine Polk Failla in the Southern District of New York requesting a trial window between October 5 and 12, with proceedings expected to last roughly three weeks. A jury previously convicted Storm on one count of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business, but deadlocked on the more serious charges: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions. Those two counts carry a combined potential sentence of up to 40 years.
Storm’s defense team indicated they would not be available until late 2026, ruling out an earlier spring window prosecutors had floated. Storm responded publicly, calling the retrial push an effort “to make writing code a crime” and pointing out what he described as a direct contradiction between the prosecution and current White House policy signals.
Bitcoin BTC$77,250.00▲1.50%
Ethereum ETH$2,109.21▲1.97%
Tether USDT$0.9990▲0.03%
BNB BNB$661.00▲1.72%
XRP XRP$1.35▲1.39%
USDC USDC$0.9997▼0.00%
Solana SOL$85.28▲1.61%
TRON TRX$0.3715▲1.98%
Figure Heloc FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲0.00%
Dogecoin DOGE$0.1022▲1.46%The Policy Contradiction at the Center of This Case
Storm’s frustration is not without foundation. Several significant policy shifts have occurred since his original indictment. The U.S. Treasury has lifted its Tornado Cash sanctions. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memo stating the DOJ is “not a digital assets regulator” and would not target crypto mixers for the actions of their end users. President Trump declared the “war on crypto” officially over.
Most notably, a Treasury report to Congress this week acknowledged that lawful users of digital assets may rely on mixers to protect financial privacy on public blockchains. Treasury cited legitimate use cases including shielding personal wealth, business payments, charitable donations, and consumer spending from public view. That language represents a meaningful departure from years of framing mixers almost exclusively as sanctions-evasion infrastructure.
The same report, however, kept enforcement mechanisms intact. Treasury noted that custodial mixers operating as registered money services businesses, with screening, record-keeping, and suspicious activity reporting in place, could occupy a compliant space. The department is drawing a line between supervised privacy and unaccountable concealment, not abandoning the distinction altogether.
Starknet Moves Toward Compliant Privacy Infrastructure
The broader policy context makes Starknet’s announced STRK20 framework worth examining carefully. The protocol is developing a token standard designed to enable privacy-preserving stablecoins and other assets with built-in confidentiality at the infrastructure level. That kind of approach, privacy embedded in protocol design rather than bolted on through mixing, points toward exactly the architecture regulators say they can work with.
The direction aligns with Treasury’s own reasoning: as public blockchain transaction volumes approached 3.8 billion monthly in early 2025, full on-chain transparency became a genuine business liability for institutional participants, not just a concern for privacy advocates. Payroll flows, treasury movements, and commercial settlements do not belong in public view.
What Comes Next
The Storm retrial, if it proceeds in October, will test whether the DOJ’s stated policy evolution translates into courtroom behavior or remains aspirational language. For developers building on public infrastructure, that distinction matters enormously. The architecture of financial privacy is being built right now; the legal framework governing it is still catching up. Getting both right is the work that defines this moment in blockchain infrastructure.
